INFLUENCE OF G7 AND G20 COUNTRIES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF WORLD ECONOMY УДК 336.16:339 JEL: 1Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/ 078281 EFFICIENCY FOR THE WORLD ECONOMY OF BRAINSTORMING OF G7 LEADERS The issue of brainstorming is considered, in which it is important to consider the presence of factors that negatively affect the quality of the decisions made in a group and to develop a filter system to prevent such distortions. The example of the G7 and G20 shows the formats of brainstorming. Thus, thanks to rotation of group members the cost of group thinking is reduced. In modern literature, it is noted that group thinking is one of the most serious forms of deformation of the quality of group discussions, which cause critics of group forms of expertise to blame them for their poor performance compared to individual forms of analytical activity. Keywords:G7 countries; G20 countries; brainstorming; globalization; world economy.
1. Kovalenko A., Korniev M. Social Psychology. Kyiv, Geoprint, 2006, available at: library.udpu.edu.ua/library_files/414683.pdf [in Ukrainian]. 2. Borishpolets K. Methods of Political Research. Moscow, Aspect Press, 2010 [in Russian]. 3. Florensky P. The Pillar and Ground. Moscow, Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2010 [in Russian]. 4. Albert M. Capitalism Against Capitalism. Saint Petersburg, The School of Economics, 1998 [in Russian]. 5. Simonov K. Political Analysis. Moscow, Logos, 2002 [in Russian]. 6. Abbott K.W., Keohane R., Moravcsik A., Slaughter A., Snidal D. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization, 2000, Vol. 54, Iss. 3, pp. 401-419. doi.org/10.1162/002081800551271 7. Wallerstein I. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1979. 8. Williamson J. The Washington Consensus Revisited, in: Economic and Social Development into the XXI Century. L. Emmerji (Ed.). Washington, DC, Inter-American Development Bank, 1997. 9. Arrighi G., Silver B. Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1999. 10. Adler E. Constructivism and International Relations, in: Handbook of International Relations. W. Carlsnaes, Th. Risse, B.A. Simmons (Eds.). Sage Publications Ltd, 2002. 11. Ruggie J.G. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization, autumn, 1998, Vol. 52 (4), pp. 855-885. doi.org/10.1162/002081898550770 12. Buchanan J.M. An Economic Theory of Clubs. Economica,1965, No. 32 (125), pp. 1-14. doi.org/10.2307/2552442 13. Fratianni M., Pattison J.C. International Organisations in a World of Regional Trade Agreements: Lessons from Club Theory. World Economy, 2001, No. 24 (3), pp. 333-369. doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00359 14. Kirton J.J. Embedded Ecologism and Institutional Inequality: Linking Trade, Environment, and Social Cohesion in the G8, in: NAFTA Experiences, Global Challenges. V.W. Maclaren (Ed.). Aldershot, Ashgate, 2002. 15. Sandler T., Tschirhart J.T. Club Theory: Thirty Years Later, Public Choice. 1997, No. 93 (3), pp. 335-355. doi.org/10.1023/A:1017952723093 16. Hermawan Y.P., Sriyuliani W., Hardjowijono G.H., et al. The Role of Indonesia in the G20: Background, Role, and Objectives of Indonesia's Membership. Jakarta, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Indonesia Office, 2011, available at: library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/indonesien/08365.pdf (accessed on 17.07.2013). 17. Stephens G. Information and Communication: G8 Institutionalization and Compliance in the DOT Force, in: Making Global Governance Effective: Hard and Soft Law Institutions in a Crowded World. J.J. Kirton, M. Larionova, M. Savona (Eds.). Farnham, Ashgate, 2010. |