ECONOMIC PROBLEMS OF THE NATURE MANAGEMENT УДК 330.15 : 330.14 : 336.225 : 553 : 574 JEL: RAZOWSKУI Yurii1, SUHINA Оlena2, GORENKOVA Katerуna3 1S.Yu. Vitte Moscow University, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/ CLASSIFICATION OF THE MINERAL RAW-MATERIAL AND ECOLOGICAL CAPITALS It is noted that the classification of a mineral raw-material capital is expedient for the differentiation of rent payments for the use of Earth’s interior for the extraction of mineral resources, whereas the classification of an ecological capital is necessary for the differentiation of ecological taxes (ecological rental payment in the future). Keywords:mineral raw-material and ecological capitals, mining and ecological rents, single criterion, economized classification, payments oriented to a rent, tax differentiation
1. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES, Version 4.1). Copenhagen, Nottingham, European Environment Agency, 2012. 2. Costanza R., Daly H.E. Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 1992, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 37–46. 3. Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, Vol. 387, pp. 253–260. 4. Costanza R. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol. Conservation, 2008, No. 141, pp. 350–352. 5. Baibusinov Sh.Sh., Shkiperova G.T. Problemy kapitalizatsii prirodnogo kapitala regiona [Problems of the capitalization of the natural capital of a region], available at: www.krc.karelia.ru/doc_download.php?id=312 [in Russian]. 6. Bobylev S.N., Perelet R.A., Solov’eva S.V. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke i vnedreniyu sistemy platezhei za ekosistemnye uslugi na OOPT [proekt] [Methodical recommendations on the assessment and introduction of a system of payments for ecosystem services on SPNT [project]]. Moscow, 2011 [in Russian]. 7. Razowskii Yu.V., Makarkin Yu.N., Gorenkova E.Yu. Mineral’no-Syr’evoi Kapital [Mineral Raw-Material Capital]. Moscow, “U Nikitskikh vorot”, 2013 [in Russian]. 8. Razowskii Yu.V. Klassifikatsiya prirodnogo kapitala [Classification of a natural capital]. Gorn. Zh. – Mining J., 2015, No. 5, pp. 37–39 [in Russian]. 9. Razowskii Yu.V., Matyukha V.V., Suhina E.N. Strategiya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v sfere nedropol’zovaniya Rossii i Ukrainy [Public administration strategy in the mineral resources management sphere of Russia and Ukraine]. Gorn. Zh. – Mining J., 2012, No. 4, pp. 3–7 [in Russian]. 10. Matyukha V.V. Metodologicheskii podkhod po usovershenstvovaniyu ekonomicheskoi otsenki stoimosti mineral’no-syr’evykh resursov [A methodological approach to the improvement of the economic assessment of the cost of mineral raw-material resources]. Gorn. Zh. – Mining J., 2013, No. 3, pp. 56–57 [in Russian]. 11. Neverov A.V., Derevyago I.P., Neverov D.A. Ekologicheskii kapital: soderzhanie i teoriya vosproizvodstva [Ecological capital: content and the theory of reproduction]. Mekh. Regul. Ekon. – Mech. of Regul. of the Economy, 2010, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 32–45 [in Russian]. 12. Guerry A.D., Polasky S., Lubchenco J. et al. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proceed. of the NAS of the USA, 2015, Vol. 112, No. 24, pp. 7348–7355. 13. Perelet R.A. Platezhi za ekosistemnye uslugi: teoriya, metodologiya i zarubezhnyi opyt prakticheskogo ispol’zovaniya [Payments for ecosystem services: theory, methodology, and foreign experience of practical use], available at: www.wildnet.ru/state/docs/Plateji.pdf [in Russian]. 14. Mishenin E.V., Degtyar’ N.V. Ekonomika ekosystemnykh poslug: teoretyko-metodologichni osnovy [Economy of ecosystem services: methodological-theoretic foundations]. Market. i Menedzh. Innov. – Market. and Manag. of Innov., 2015, No. 2, pp. 243–257 [in Ukrainian]. 15. Burkyns’kyi B.V., Goryachuk V.F. Otsinka pryrodnogo kapitalu regioniv Ukrainy yak umova formuvannya zelenoi ekonomiky [Assessment of the natural capital of Ukraine’s regions as a condition of the formation of the green economy]. Ekon. Innov. – Econ. Innovat., 2013, Iss. 52, pp. 9–20 [in Ukrainian]. 16. Glazyrina I.P. Platezhi za ekosistemnye uslugi i Kheredianskaya Deklaratsiya [Payments for ecosystem services and the Heredia Declaration]. Ekon. Prirodopol. – Econ. of Nature Manag., 2012, No. 5, рр. 59–68 [in Russian]. 17. Stanton T., Echavarria M., Hamilton K., Ott C. State of watershed payments: an emerging marketplace. Ecosystem marketplace, available at: www.foresttrends.org/documents/files/doc_2438.pdf. 18. Suhina O.M. Rozvytok teorii ekologichnoi renty ta ii spravedlyvogo rozpodilu [Development of the theory of ecological rent and its fair distribution]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2014, No. 7, pp. 49–68 [in Ukrainian]. 19. Suhina O.M. Capital écologique des communautés unis locales de l’Ukraine: la recherche d'écorente, in: Modern Transformation of Economics and Management in the Era of Globalization. Proceedings of the Intern. Sci. Conference, January 29, 2016, Klaipeda. Klaipeda, Baltija Publ., 2016, pp. 232–236. 20. Suhina E.N. Economized classification of assimilative services of ecosystems as the instrument of their monetization in the development CICES, in: From Baltic to Black Sea: National Models of Economic Systems. Proceedings of the Intern. Sci.-Pract. Conference, Part I, March 25, 2016, Riga. Riga, Baltija Publ., 2016, pp. 226–231. 21. Suhina O.M. Еcological rent: evaluation methodology, in: Innovative Potential of Socio-Economic Systems: the Challenges of the Global World. Proceedings of the Intern. Sci.-Pract. Conference, Part II, June 30, 2016, Lissаbon. Lissаbon, Riga, Baltija Publ., 2016, pp. 74–77. |