УДК 338.1(477) JEL: F52, F55, J15, H12 1SESE “Academy of Financial Management”, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/HMP-1501-2023 DIRECTIONS FOR COUNTERACTING THE FACTORS OF DESTABILIZATION IN THE WORLD SPACE OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: LESSONS FOR UKRAINE To overcome the manifestations of structural imbalance and incomparable disparities between accumulation and consumption, between income and expenditure at the macro and micro levels, etc. the rise of public administration should focus on the restoration of economy’s indicators to pre-crisis levels as soon as possible. In the period of strengthening the resilience and recovery of the world economy after the crisis of COVID-19, coordination at the supranational level of management, organization and entrepreneurship efforts aimed at counteracting the destabilization threats will be extremely important. To this end, we have identified the recognized factors of destabilization of the world economy, substantiated the priority areas for counteracting the threats to equilibrium in the modern space of business activity, which are becoming critical for the recovery of Ukraine's economy. The following methods were used for this: space-time situational analysis and synthesis; comparison of the dynamics of statistical macroeconomic indicators; abstract-logical, systematic approach in the implementation of theoretical generalizations, substantiation of determinants and laying down of research conclusions. Keywords:crisis; pandemic; economic recovery; social relations; The International Monetary Fund; The European Union; reforms.
1. Estévez A. Zoomism and discipline for productive immobility. Critical Legal Thinking, May 13, 2020, available at: criticallegalthinking.com/2020/05/13/zoomism-and-discipline-for-productive-immobility/?fbclid=IwAR3By_LRMlpKywLYToxHfiQG9usKIGtUlQqCcTtSfB4ZAkcxxLlg3Ba6L8 2. Klein N. Screen new deal. The Intercept, May 8, 2020, available at: theintercept.com/2020/05/08/andrew-cuomo-eric-schmidt-coronavirus-tech-shock-doctrine 3. Epstein R., Borrell-Carrio F., Suchman A. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Annals of Family Medicine, 2000, Vol. 2 (6), pp. 576-582. doi.org/10.1370/afm.245 4. Siddique H. British BAME Covid-19 death rate 'more than twice that of whites'. The Guardian, May 1, 2020, available at: www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/01/british-bame-covid-19-death-rate-more-than-twice-that-of-whites 5. Pilkington E. Black Americans dying of Covid-19 at three times the rate of white people. The Guardian, May 20, 2020, available at: www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/20/black-americans-death-rate-covid-19-coronavirus 6. Winborg J., Landström H. Financial bootstrapping in small businesses: Examining small business managers' resource acquisition behaviors. Journal of Business Venturing, 2020, Vol. 16 (3), pp. 235-254. doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00055-5 7. Kim P.H., Aldrich H.E., Keister L.A. Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human, and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Business Economics, 2006, Vol. 27 (1), pp. 5-22. doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0007-x 8. Miao C., Rutherford M.W., Pollack J.M. An exploratory meta-analysis of the nomological network of bootstrapping in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 2017, Vol. 8, pp. 1-8. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.04.002 9. Vanacker T., Manigart S., Meuleman M., Sels L. A longitudinal study on the relationship between financial bootstrapping and new venture growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2011, Vol. 23 (9-10), pp. 681-705. doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.502250 10. Martinez A. Bios, mythoi and women entrepreneurs: A Wynterian analysis of the intersectional impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-employed women and women-owned businesses. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 2020, Vol. 38 (5), pp. 391-403. doi.org/10.1177/0266242620939935 11. Healy G., Bradley H. Forson C. Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 2011, Vol. 18 (5), pp. 467-487. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00557.x 12. Ewing-Nelson C. Despite Slight Gains in May, Women Have Still Been Hit Hardest by Pandemic- Related Job Losses. National Women's Law Center, 2020, available at: nwlc-ciw49tixgw5lbab.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/May-Jobs-FS.pdf 13. Martinez Dy A. Not all entrepreneurship is created equal: Theorising entrepreneurial disadvantage through social positionality. European Management Review, January 29, 2020. doi.org/10.1111/emre.12390 14. Berry D., Bell M.P. Inequality in organizations: Stereotyping, discrimination, and labor law exclusions. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2012, Vol. 31 (3), pp. 236-248. doi.org/10.1108/02610151211209090 15. Villares-Varela M. Negotiating class, femininity and career: Latin American migrant women entrepreneurs in Spain. International Migration, 2017, Vol. 56, pp. 109-124. doi.org/10.1111/imig.12361 16. Warner F.C. Investors: The future of the tech industry depends on us. Medium, May 18, 2020, available at: medium.com/@checkwarner/investors-the-future-of-the-tech-industry-depends-on-us-8a384911ef86. 17. Von Briel F., Recker J., Davidsson P. Not all digital venture ideas are created equal: Implications for venture creation processes. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2018, Vol. 27 (4), pp. 278-295. doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.06.002 18. Duffy B.E., Pruchniewska U. Gender and self-enterprise in the social media age: A digital double bind. Information, Communication & Society, 2017, Vol. 20 (6), pp. 843-859. doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1291703 19. Gill R. Unspeakable inequalities: Post feminism, entrepreneurial subjectivity, and the repudiation of sexism among cultural workers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 2014. Vol. 21 (4), pp. 509-528. doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxu016 20. Dattani K. Rethinking social reproduction in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 2020, Vol 85, pp. 51-56. 21. Cunningham I. Public service outsourcing and its employment implications in an era of austerity: The case of British social care. Competition & Change, 2014, Vol. 18 (1), pp. 1-19. doi.org/10.1179/1024529413Z.00000000045 22. Cockburn H. Coronavirus: How 'viral load' and genetics could explain why young people have died from Covid-19. The Independent, April 6, 2020, available at: www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-viral-load-genetics-young-people-genes-symptoms-covid-19-a9451101.html. 23. Alfrey L., Twine F.W. Gender-fluid geek girls: Negotiating inequality regimes in the tech industry. Gender and Society, 2020, Vol. 31 (1), pp. 28-50. doi.org/10.1177/0891243216680590 |