Economy of Ukraine
Published since September 1958
Login

№ 7/2019

Ekon Ukr. 2019 (7): 71–88
https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2019.07.071

SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

УДК 316.334:35.072.1(438)(477)

BUTKO Mykola1, REVKO Alona2

1Chernihiv Polytechnic National University, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/I-3869-2016
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8628-9444
2Chernihiv National University of Technology
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7888-3657


PECULIARITIES OF FUNCTIONING OF THE SOCIO-HUMANITARIAN SPACE UNDER CONDITIONS OF DECENTRALIZED MANAGEMENT: POLAND’S EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS FOR UKRAINE


The current strategy of sustainable development of Ukraine should include the development of a nationally consolidated, spiritual-intellectual, open-democratic, cultural-diverse, creative and informational society where the main dominant is the harmonization of the social environment with active horizontal and vertical ties, which are based on a well-grounded institutional provision. The objective of this strategy, given the loss of much of the economic potential, tragic victims and forcible migration from Crimea and East Ukraine, is to ensure the national identity, historical catholicity, comprehensive self-realization, socialization and a decent standard of living, security, formation of an innovatively dynamic economy and the system of national education, science, culture, medicine, physical culture and sports, recreation, and information integration of Ukrainian nation into a civilized world. The purpose of this article is to study the peculiarities of the manifestation of the socio-humanitarian space for the sustainable development of the regions of Ukraine and to develop a spatial model for the organization of social infrastructure under conditions of decentralized management based on the experience of the Republic of Poland. Structural-functional and space-regulating components of the socio-humanitarian space are determined. It is determined that institutions of social infrastructure are characterized by diversified properties, which are the basis for determining the spatial model of the organization of social infrastructure. This model depends on the interconnection of infrastructure facilities with the service space, as well as the number and structure of the population of this space. Based on Poland’s experience, a spatial model for the organization of the social infrastructure of the socio-humanitarian space of Ukraine is developed; the model grounds on a clear delineation of tasks and responsibilities between central and local authorities. The vectors of modernization of social infrastructure of the socio-humanitarian space of regions of Ukraine are determined.


Keywords:socio-humanitarian space; social infrastructure; subsidiarity; decentralization; local authorities; spatial model of social infrastructure

Бібл. 15; рис. 5; табл. 1

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 71 - 88) DownloadDownloads :292
The article was received by the Editorial staff on March 6 , 2019

References


1. Wolff K.H. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, Illinois, The Free Press, 1950.

2. Ledrut R. La Formeet le Sensdans la Société [Shape and Sense in Society]. Paris, Librairie des Méridiens, 1984 [in French].

3. Jałowiecki B. PrzestrzeńSpołeczna, w: EncyklopediaSocjologii [Social Space, in: Sociology Encyclopedia]. Warszawa, OficynaNaukowa, 2000, Vol. 3 [in Polish].

4. Pepa T.V., Chernyuk L.G. Infrastrukturne Zabezpechennya Sotsial'noho Rozvytku Rehioniv Ukrainy (Metodoloho-Orhanizatsiinyi Aspekt) [Infrastructure Support of Social Development of Ukraine's Regions (Methodological and Organizational Aspect)].Vinnitsia, Edel'veis i K, 2015 [in Ukrainian].

5. Vovkanych S.I. Sotsiohumanistychni Imperatyvy Transformatsii Humanitarnoi Polityky v Umovakh Hibrydnoi Viiny i Zahroz Buttyu ukrains'kosti.Preprynt nauk.dop.[Sociohumanist Imperatives for the Transformation of Humanitarian Policy in the Face of Hybrid Warfare and the Threats to the Existence of Ukraine.Preprint of scientific report].Lviv, Institute of Regional Research named after M.I. Dolishniy of the NAS of Ukraine, 2018 [in Ukrainian].

6. Sotsiohumanitarnyi Prostir i Rozvytok Produktyvnykh Syl Ukrainy: Metodolohichni Aspekty Vyznachennya Vzaemodii [Sociohumanitarian Space and Development of Productive Forces of Ukraine: Methodological Aspects of Determining Interaction]. M.A. Khvesyk (Ed.). Kyiv, NAS of Ukraine, Council for the Study of Productive Forces of Ukraine, 2009 [in Ukrainian].

7. Kupiec L., Gołębiowska A., Wyszkowska D. GospodarkaPrzestrzenna [Spatial Economy]. Białystok, WydawnictwoUniwersytetu w Białymstiku, 2004, T. IV: Infrastrukturas połeczna [in Polish].

8. Moskalenko S.O. Aktual'ni problem derzhavnoho upravlinnya u konteksti formuvannya ta rozvytku sotsiohumanitarnoho prostoru v Ukraini [Actual problems of public administration in the context of formation and development of socio-humanitarian space in Ukraine]. Aktual'ni problem derzhavnoho upravlinnya.Zb. nauk.pr. - Actual problems of public administration. Studies digest, 2013, Iss. 3 (55), pp. 97-101 [in Ukrainian].

9. Bandur S.I., Zayats' T.A., Kutsenko V.I. Sotsial'nyi Rozvytok Ukrainy: Suchasni Transformatsii ta Perspektyvy [Social Development of Ukraine: Modern Transformations and Prospects]. Cherkasy, Brama-Ukraina, 2006 [in Ukrainian].

10. Kokocińska K. PolitykaRegionalna w Polsce i w UniiEuropejskiej [Regional Policy in Poland and in the European Union].Poznań, WydawnictwoNaukowe UAM, 2009 [in Polish].

11. Dahlke P. SamorządTerytorialny w Procesie Kształtowania Rozwoju Gospodarczego Regionuna Przykładzie Województwa Wielkopolskiego [Local Government in the Process of Shaping the Region's Economic Development on the Example of the Wielkopolska Region]. Piła, Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowejim. StanisławaStaszica, 2017 [in Polish].

12. Szetela P. Rola amorządu terytorialnego w polskim systemie ochronyzdrowia: organizator, podmiottworzącyoraz płatnik [The role of territorial self-government in the Polish healthcare system: the organizer, the creating entity and the payer]. Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie, 2015, No. 13 (1), pp. 55-68 [in Polish].

13. Herbst M. Decentralizacja Oświaty [Decentralization of Education]. Warszawa, Biblioteczka Oświaty Samorządowej, 2012, No. 7 [in Polish].

14. Głowacki J. Finansowanie Kultury i ZarządzanieInstytucjamiKultury [Financing Culture and Managing Institutions of Culture].Kraków, UniwersytetEkonomiczny, Małopolska Szkoła Administracji Publicznej, 2007 [in Polish].

15. Butko M.P., Revko A.M. Sotsial'na infrastruktura yak katalizator modernizatsii sotsiohumanitarnoho prostoru rehioniv Ukrainy [Social infrastructure as a catalyst of modernization of Ukrainian regions' social-humanitarian space]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 2017, No. 4 (86), pp. 28-37 [in Ukrainian].