№ 11/2022

Ekon Ukr. 2022 (11): 3–25https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.11.003

PROBLEMS OF ECONOMIC THEORY

УДК 331.101.26 : 316.422”20”

JEL: J200, J290

KOLOT Anatolii¹, HERASYMENKO Oksana²

¹Kyiv National Economic University after Vadym Hetman, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55338407700
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4393-9806
²Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/http://www.researcherid.com/rid/K-8003-2018
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1122-1189

TEMPORAL IMPERATIVES OF SOCIAL AND LABOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE XXI CENTURY

A new approach and an unconventional view of social and labor issues through the prism of temporality are highlighted. The proposed temporal construct opens new facets of complex, multi-vector drivers of social and labor development in the modern digital age. Conceptualization regarding temporal essence of phenomena and processes in new socio-economic reality in the first half of the XXI century has been expanded; the nature of temporal transformations and changes in the organization and flow of time at different levels of social hierarchy is argued. A theoretical and applied basis for the development of economic entities’ temporal strategies, which is updated due to the change in forms, properties, functions of economic and social time, has been created.
It has been proven that there is a multidimensionality of time in the new socio-economic reality, when distinction between work and leisure disappears and, as a result, a diffusion of working and spare time occurs, and acceleration, haste, and a sense of constant time deficit become a new format of life. Temporal trends that have formed in the world society at the turn of the millennium and appear as paradoxes of "social time" have been summarized. It has been proven that modern society is a society of acceleration. Emphasis is placed on the paradox of the complex, multi-vector relationship between technical acceleration and social interaction both at work and in leisure time, as opposed to the expected sharp increase in leisure (off-work) time.
Proposals regarding invariant models of working time in the context of modern transformations in the world of work which correlate with standard and non-standard models of employment have been presented. It has been suggested to develop a national project related to the experimental assessment of the socio-economic impact of various working time models. It has been proven that socio-economic, social and labor issues will be solved more quickly and efficiently, if the theory of temporal analysis is used and implemented in the economic activity on the basis of sustainable development principles.

Keywords:temporality; temporary transformations; temporal analysis; social and labor development; working hours; implementation of temporal innovations

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 3 - 25)

Download

Downloads :151

The article was received by the Editorial staff on October 6 , 2022

References
1. Kolot A.M., Herasymenko O.O. Work XXI: philosophy of change, challenges, vectors of development. Kyiv, 2021 [in Ukrainian].

2. Kolot A., Herasymenko O. Novel formats of labor activity organization: nature, challenges, development trajectories. Economy of Ukraine, 2022, No. 5, pp. 59-76 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.05.059

3. Heidegger M. Time and Being. Articles and speeches. Moscow, 1993, available at: imwerden.de/pdf/heidegger_vremya_i_bytie_1993.pdf [in Russian].

4. Heidegger M. The Concept of Time. M., 2021 [in Russian].

5. Masi D. Ozio Creativo. Roma, BUR Biblioteca Univerzale Rizzoli, 2002.

6. Virno P. A Grammar of the Multitude. For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life. M., 2013 [in Russian].

7. Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Malden, MA, Blackwell, 2010.
doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514

8. Wajcman J. Pressed for Time. The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. M., 2019 [in Russian].

9. Skidelsky R., Skidelsky E. How Much is Enough? Penguin UK, 2013.

10. Schor J. Plenitude: The New Economics of True Wealth. New York, Penguin, 2010.

11. Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity. Blackwell Cambridge, 1989.

12. Banerjee A.V., Duflo E. Good Economics for Hard Times. Kyiv, 2021 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.31244/zep.2021.03.12

13. Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class. Kyiv, 2018 [in Ukrainian].

14. Nowotny H. Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2005.

15. Robinson J. Americans Less Rushed But No Happier: 1965-2010 Trends in Subjective Time and Happiness. Social Indicators Research, 2013, Vol. 113, pp. 1091-1104.
doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0133-6

16. Meadows D. Growth must stop. Odnako, 2012, No. 17 (126), available at: ideasforworld.org/files/publications/10.pdf [in Russian].

17. Harrison L., Huntington S. (Eds.). Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York, Basic Books, 2000, available at: ia800505.us.archive.org/19/items/CultureMattersHowValuesShapeHumanProgress/Culture%20Matters%20How%20Values%20Shape%20Human%20Progress.pdf

18. Kolot А.M., Herasymenko O.A. Generation Z and socio-labor platform "Work 4.0": interaction imperatives. Demography and social economy, 2020, No. 2 (40), pp. 103-138 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/dse2020.02.103

19. Floud R., Fogel R.W., Harris B., Sok Chul Hong. The Changing Body: Health, Nutrition, and Human Development in the Western World Since 1700. NBER. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975912

20. Kolot A., Herasymenko O., Marshavin Yu. Atomization of living space and diffusion of labor activity in the context of coronacrisis: manifestations, consequences and vectors of overcoming. Social and Labour Relations: Theory and Practice, 2021, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 10-25 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.21511/slrtp.11(2).2021.02