Economy of Ukraine
Published since September 1958
Login

№ 10/2017

Ekon Ukr. 2017 (10): 3–17

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSIONS

УДК 330.001.7+32.001.7] – 042.5/8:330.34(477)

JEL:

HEYETS Valeriy1

1Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/ 57194145214
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2895-6114


PECULIARITIES OF INTERRELATIONSHIP OF ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL TRANSFORMATIONS ON THE WAY TO RECONSTRUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE’S ECONOMY Part I. From cosmopolitan universalism to the evolutionary-institutional interpretation of economic development


The article is devoted to issues of transformational changes necessary in the sphere of economy and politics and overcoming the political cycle in economic policy along this path, taking into account processes of decentralization and strengthening the role of national states in ensuring the protection of social and economic interests under conditions of the forming a new social reality of a erson centric nature with new economic relations. The key
point should be raising the social capital to a new level on the basis of development of
human personality, which in political and economic sense should be able to bring the
country and its economy on the path of development.
The main task of our state is to ensure the implementation of a policy aimed at forming
such a level of competitiveness of the national economy, which would allow, under
conditions of a new transformational nature of globalization economic processes, to be a
worthy subject in the system of international and inter economy relations and to be able
to protect national interests, comprehensively focusing on the policy of avoiding the
threatening debts. The latter deepens social stratification and occurs under pressure of
modern world financial architecture, as a result of using (among others) the financial
innovations that bring higher incomes and thereby limiting investment in the real sector
and curbing the pace of economic growth. Under such conditions, respectively, degree of
dependence of the national state on international creditors increases. This is the result of global domination of cosmopolitan universalism, the overcoming of which, in our opinion, is linked to development of evolutionary institutional approaches in economic policy.
Implementation of this policy implies a significant increase in responsibility of national governments, which, in turn, actualizes ideology of historicism, including that in economic theory. Development of historical and logical foundations of market relations in Ukraine is associated with the name of the world renowned scientist economist M. Tugan
Baranovsky; that confirms the presence of certain historical traditions in Ukrainian
economic science, which give grounds for finding the ways to succeed in modern
conditions


Keywords:system transformations, political cycle, social capital, human personality, demonopolization, market fundamentalism, network systems, corporate interests, national interests, evolutionary

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 3 - 17) DownloadDownloads :255
Article original in Russian (pp. 3 - 17) DownloadDownloads :252
The article was received by the Editorial staff on August 18 , 2017

References

1. Heyets V.M. Osoblyvosti vzaemozv’yazku ekonomichnykh ta politychnykh peredumov
rekonstruktyvnoho rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrainy [Peculiarities of the interrelation of
economic and political preconditions of a reconstructive development of Ukraine’s
economy]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2016, No. 12, pp. 3–21 [in
Ukrainian].
2. Heyets V.M. Dovira i rozvytok v ukrains’kykh realiyak [Trust and development in
Ukrainian realities]. Proceedings from: Tvorennya prostoru suspil’noi doviry v Ukraini XXI
storichchya. Mizhnar. nauk.+prakt. konf. Lviv, 17–19 lyutoho 2016 [Creation of a space of
public trust in Ukraine in the 21st century. Int. Sci. and practical conference. Lviv, February
17–19, 2016]. Lviv, SHEI “University of Banking”, 2016, pp. 15–31 [in Ukrainian].
3. Artomova T.I., Gritsenko A.A., Krichevskaya T.A. et al. Ierarkhiya i Seti v
Institutsional’noi Arkhitektonike Ekonomicheskikh Sistem [Hierarchy and Networks in the
Institutional Architectonics of Economic Systems]. A.A. Gritsenko (Ed.). Kyiv, Institute
for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine, 2013 [in Russian].
4. Mason P. Postkapitalizm: Putevoditel’ po Nashemu Budushchemu [Postcapitalism:
A Guide to our Future]. Moscow, AdMarginem, 2016 [in Russian].
5. Stiglitz J.E. Globalization and its Discontents. N.Y., W.W. Norton, 2012.
6. List F. Natsional’naya Sistema Politicheskoi Ekonomii [The National System of
Political Economy]. K.V. Trubnikov (Ed.). Moscow, Evropa, 2005 [in Russian].
7. Williamson J., Milanovic B., Lindert P. Measuring Ancient Inequality. MPRA Paper
5388, 2007, October.
8. Faux J. Torhovel’na polityka SShA – chas pochaty spochatku [U.S. trade policy –
time to start over]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2017, No. 5-6, pp. 16–30
[in Ukrainian].
9. Mekhanik A. “Inoe” vse-taki dano [“Other” is still given]. Ekspert – Expert, 2017,
No. 7 (1017), pp. 39–40 [in Russian].
10. Stiglitz J. Globalizatsiya: Trevozhnye Tendentsii [Globalization and Its
Discontents]. Moscow, National Socio
Scientific Foundation, 2003, available at: www.library.fa.ru/files/Stiglitz-global.pdf [in Russian].
11. Tugan-Baranovskii M.I. Ocherki iz Noveishei Istorii Politicheskoi Ekonomii i
Sotsializma, t.1, v: Izbrannye Sochineniya v 2 t. [Essays from the Modern History of Political
Economy and Socialism, Vol. 1, in: Selected Works, in 2 volumes]. L.I. Dmitrichenko
(Ed.). Donetsk, Donetsk SUET, 2004 [in Russian].
12. Heyets V.M., Nebrat V.V., Suprun N.A., Tarasevych V.M. et al. Tuhan-Baranovs’kyi M.I. – Vchenyi, Gromadyanyn, Derzhavotvorets’ [Tugan-Baranovsky M.I. –
Scientist, Citizen, Statesman]. Kyiv, Naukova dumka, 2015 [in Ukrainian].
13. Stiglitz J. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our
Future. N.Y., W.W. Norton & Co, 2012.
14. Brenner R. Ekonomika Global’noi Turbulentnosti [The Economics of Global
Turbulence]. Moscow, PH of High School of Economics, 2014 [in Russian].
15. Mead W.R. The Jacksonian Revolt. American Populism and the Liberal Order.
Foreign Affairs, 2017, No. 2, available at: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2017-01-20/jacksonian-revolt.
16. Ricceri M. Kak spasti sotsial’nost’ rynochnoi ekonomiki [How to save the sociality
of a market economy]. Mir peremen – The world of changes, 2017, No. 1, pp. 124–138 [in
Russian].
17. Heyets V.M. Liberal’no+demokratychni zasady: kurs na modernizatsiyu Ukrainy
[Liberal-democratic principles: course to a modernization of Ukraine]. Ekonomika
Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2010, No. 3, pp. 4–20 [in Ukrainian].
18. Berezin M., Genschel Ph., Crouch C. et al. Politika v Epokhu Zhestkoi Ekonomii
[Politics in the Age of Austerity]. A. Schafer, W. Streeck (Eds.). Moscow, PH of High
School of Economics, 2015 [in Russian].