№ 10/2017

Ekon Ukr. 2017 (10): 18–30

ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT: THEORY AND PRACTICE

УДК 334.021:622.33

JEL:

AMOSHA Oleksandr¹, CHEREVATSKYI Danylo², PETROVA Iryna³

¹Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-3819
²Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-3166-2018
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4038-6393
³Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/

CONCERNING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PUBLIC7PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE SPHERE OF COAL MINING

The continued existence of state owned mines is not possible without involvement of private investment. In this regard, the most promising is corporate development of the mine field, which is a form
of cooperation between a private company, which has a license for its own area within
the mine field of a state mine and using its own equipment for production of coal, and
a state enterprise (mine) that provides the firm for a fee with technological services for
lifting, transport, ventilation, dewatering, energy supply, etc. Scientific discussion
concerning the interpretations of this phenomenon, in particular around the nature of
corporate development of the mine field as a form of public-private partnership, and
presence of opposite considerations have revealed the expediency to develop a method
for classifying the models of interaction between coal mining subjects with various forms
of ownership. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to improve classification of the state
private (public-private) partnerships in the extractive industries. To summarize
the various forms of public-private partnership, an approach based on trigrams
containing the features of “ownership – financing – management” has been used in
the work. Two trigrams corresponding to the position of two subjects (private and state)
form a hexagram. The matrix of hexagrams contains all possible variants of models of
public-private partnership.
It is proved that corporate development of the mine field, which is the most relevant
in terms of development of mines in public sector, is not a form of public-private
partnership; however it can be realized as such through the model of industrial park created
under concession agreement between the Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine
and private company managing the industrial park.

Keywords:private company, state mine, public-private partnership, joint activity, corporate development of the mine field, form, industrial park

Article original in Russian (pp. 18 - 30)	Download	Downloads :120
Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 18 - 30)	Download	Downloads :86

The article was received by the Editorial staff on November 30 , -0001

References
1. Gerrard M.B. What are public-private partnerships, and how do they differ from
privatizations? Finance & Development, 2001, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 441–451, available at:
www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/09/gerrard.htm.
2. Varnavskii V. Gosudarstvenno+chastnoe partnerstvo: nekotorye voprosy teorii i praktiki [Public-private partnership: some issues of theory and practice]. Mirovaya ekonomika i
mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya – World Economy and International Relations, 2011, No. 9,
pp. 41–50 [in Russian].
3. Mathu K. The need for public-private partnership model in the South African
coal-mining industry. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER Publishing, 2014,
March, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 224–235, available at: www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/
mjss/article/view/2210/2196.
4. Cherevatskyi D.Yu., Fokina I.V. Pro mozhlyvist’ vidnesennya spil’noi rozrobky
vuhil’nykh rodovyshch do derzhavno+pryvatnoho partnerstva [On the possibility of attributing
the joint development of coal deposits to public-private partnership]. Ugol’ Ukrainy –
Coal of Ukraine, 2016, No. 4-5, pp. 19–22 [in Ukrainian].
5. Zaloznova Yu.S., Petrova I.P. Shchodo korporatyvnoi rozrobky shakhtnoho polya yak
formy derzhavno+pryvatnoho partnerstva [Corporate development of the mine field as a form
of public-private partnership]. Skhidna Evropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnya – Eastern
Europe: economics, business and management, 2017, Iss. 7, pp. 30–34, available at: easterneurope-ebm.in.ua/journal/7_2017/07.pdf [in Ukrainian].
6. Filatov Yu.V., Naumov Yu.A., Leshchinskii A.A., Cherevatskii D.Yu. Opyt
korporativnoi razrabotki shakhtnogo polya [Experience in corporate development of the mine field]. Ugol’ Ukrainy – Coal of Ukraine, 2000, No. 11, pp. 25–28 [in Russian].
7. Amosha A.I., Zaloznova Yu.S., Cherevatskii D.Yu. Ugol’naya Promyshlennost’ i
Gibridnaya Ekonomika [Coal Industry and Hybrid Economy]. Kyiv, Institute of Industrial
Economics of the NAS of Ukraine, 2017 [in Russian].
8. Deryabina M. Gosudarstvenno+chastnoe partnerstvo: teoriya i praktika [Public-private partnership: theory and practice]. Voprosy Ekonomiki – Issues of economy, 2008, No. 8, pp. 61–77 [in Russian].
9. Cherevatskii D.Yu. Instituty Partnerstva v Trigrammakh “Sobstvennost’–Investitsii–
Proizvodstvo”, v: Formuvannya Rynkovoi Ekonomiky. Spets. vyp. : Problemy Suchasnoi Ekonomiky ta Instytutsional’na Teoriya [Institutions of Partnership in Trigrams “Ownership Investments Production”, in: Formation of a Market Economy. Special
edition: Problems of Modern Economy and Institutional Theory]. Kyiv, KNEU, 2010,
pp. 136–147 [in Russian].
10. Shutskii Yu.K. Kitaiskaya Klassicheskaya Kniga Peremen. Itszin [Chinese Classical
Book of Changes. Yi Jing]. Moscow, Russian book publishing partnership, 1993 [in
Russian].
11. Tarash L.I., Petrova I.P. Uzahal’nennya praktyky vykorystannya form derzhavno-pryvatnoho partnerstva [Generalization of practice of the use of forms of public-private partnership]. Visnyk Ekonomichnoi Nauky Ukrainy – Ukrainian Economic Science Herald, 2015, No. 2 (29), pp. 97–103 [in Ukrainian].