№ 12/2016

Ekon Ukr. 2016 (12): 22–46

УДК 338.23:330.111.62

JEL:

KINDZERSKYI Yurii¹

¹Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/D-5626-2018
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4432-6526

ІNSTITUTIONAL TRAP OF OLIGARCHISM AND PROBLEMS OF ITS OVERCOMING

The attention is focused on problems of a transformation of the property relations in Ukraine. The necessity to follow the dualistic character in the reformation of the mentioned institution is emphasized. This concerns the changes in the access of subjects to bounded resources, on the one hand, and the redistribution of the income obtained in a society, on the other hand. In this connection, the incorrectness of a simplified approach to the reformation of the property institution as to the nominal replacement of state’s proprietor by a private is shown.
The drawbacks of the denationalization, which led to the formation of the oligarchy and the institutional trap of oligarchism, are clarified. The denationalization resulted in a strengthening of the connection of the power and the business, which caused a sharpening of the problem of soft budgetary limitations; formation of extractive political and economic institutions; autonomization of the state relative to the society; strengthening of the “front democracy”; privatization of the state by the oligarchy; formation of the phenomena of an unefficient unlegitime owner, “eroded” property rights, shadow economy, and seizure of the official state by the society.
The presence of such phenomena induces the threat of the formation of a stable unefficient long-term institutional equilibrium, deepening of the differentiation of a society by property, and increase in the risks of social cataclysms. The sources and types of nonproductive and “noninnovative” rental incomes of the oligarchy and the bureaucracy, which are caused by deformations of the property institution, are shown. The looks at the policy of deregulation of the business are critically analyzed with regard for the oligarchization and deformed property relations.
The reasons for the inefficiency of traditional tools of state’s economic policy concerning the stimulation of the activity of subjects in the presence of the “eroded” property mode and the oligarchy are indicated. The author gives some recommendations as for the versions of a reformation of the property institution, which are based on the principle of “democratization” of this institution, idea of the formation of a rational ratio of state’s and private forms of property, in particular, and the inclusive development of a society on the whole.

Keywords:oligarchy, institutional trap, privatization of the state, property rights, strategic property

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 22 - 46)	Download	Downloads :296
Article original in Russian (pp. 22 - 46)	Download	Downloads :310

The article was received by the Editorial staff on October 6 , 2016

References
1. Grytsenko A. “Ukrains’ke ekonomichne dyvo”, abo Kudy vedut’ reformy? [“Ukrainian economic wonder”, or Where do the reforms lead?]. Dzerk. Tyzhnya – Week’s Mirror, June 17–23, 2016, No. 22 [in Ukrainian].
2. Gal’chyns’kyi A. Superechnosti Reform: u Konteksti Tsyvilizatsiinogo Protsesu [Contradictions of Reforms: in the Context of the Civilizational Process]. Kyiv, Ukr. Propilei, 2001 [in Ukrainian].
3. Baranovs’kyi O., Sidenko V. Problemy vlasnosti ta legalizatsii kapitaliv i dokhodiv v Ukraini [Problems of property and legalization of capitals and incomes in Ukraine]. Nats. Bezp. i Obor. – Nat. Secur. and Defense, 2004, No. 2, pp. 2–13 [in Ukrainian].
4. Nedoliky mekhanizmu pryvatyzatsii v Ukraini ta ikh naslidky [Shortcomings of the mechanism of privatization in Ukraine and their consequences]. Nats.Bezp. i Obor. – Nat. Secur. and Defense, 2004, No. 2, pp. 38–39 [in Ukrainian].
5. Rushchenko I. “Kriminal’naya revolyutsiya” kak sotsietal’nyi faktor [“Criminal revolution” as a societal factor]. Sotsiol.: Teor., Metod., Market. – Sociol.: Theory, Meth., Market., 2008, No. 3, pp. 194–210 [in Russian].
6. Rushchenko I. Ot “kriminal’noi revolyutsii” k “kriminal’nomu obshchestvu” [From “criminal revolution” to “criminal society”]. Sotsiol.: Teor., Metod., Market. – Sociol.: Theory, Meth., Market., 2014, No. 2, pp. 3–22 [in Russian].
7. Ukrains’ke Suspil’stvo: Monitoryng Sotsial’nykh Zmin [Ukrainian Society: Monitoring of Social Changes]. Kyiv, Inst. of Sociol. of the NASU, 2014, Vol. 1, Iss. 1 (15). Supplement: Tables of the monitoring pool «Ukrainian society – 2014» [in Ukrainian].
8. Bessonova O. Obraz budushchego Rossii v kontekste teorii razdatochnoi ekonomiki [The image of the future of Russia in the context of the theory of distributing economy]. Public Lectures “Polit.ru”, December 5, 2008, available at: www.polit.ru/lectures/2008/12/05/bessonova.html [in Russian].
9. Libman A. Different paths of the second transition in the post-Soviet world: a political-economic analysis. MPRA Paper, 2008, No. 11781, available at: mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11781.
10. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Pochemu Odni Strany Bogatye, a Drugie Bednye. Proiskhozhdenie Vlasti, Protsvetaniyа i Nishchety [Why Nations Fail: the Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty]. Moscow, AST, 2015 [in Russian].
11. Kapelyushnikov R. Pravo sobstvennosti (ocherk sovremennoi teorii) [Property right (essay of the modern theory)]. Otech. Zapiski – Domest. Notes, 2004, No. 6, available at: www.strana-oz.ru/2004/6/pravo-sobstvennosti-ocherk-sovremennoy-teorii [in Russian].
12. Lartsev V. Gniloi privkus obraztsovoi privatizatsii “Krivorozhstali” [The rotten smack of the exemplary privatization of “Krivorozhstal’ ”]. Intern.-Izd. “Khvylya” – Intern.-Publ. “Wave”, March 27, 2016, available at: hvylya.net/analytics/economics/gniloy¬privkus¬obraztsovoy¬privatizatsii-krivorozhstali.html [in Russian].
13. Danylenko A.I., Zymovets’ В.В. et al. Vplyv Kryzy na Finansy Real’nogo Sektora Ekonomiky Ukrainy ta Shlyakhy Ikh Ozdorovlennya, za red. A.I. Danylenka [Influence of the Crisis on Finances of the Real Sector of Ukraine’s Economy and Ways to Their Sanitation], edited by A.I. Danylenko. Kyiv, Inst. for Econ. and Forecast. of the NASU, 2014 [in Ukrainian].
14. Ekonomicheskie Sub’ekty in Postsovetskoi Rossii (Institutsional’nyi Analiz). Firmy Sovremennoi Rossii, Ch. 2, pod red. R.M. Nureeva [Economic Subjects of Post-Soviet Russia (Institutional Analysis). Firms of Modern Russia], edited by R.M. Nureev. Moscow, National Social-Sci. Fund, 2003, Part 2 [in Russian].
15. Sonin K. Institutsional’naya teoriya beskonechnogo peredela [The institutional theory of an infinite redistribution]. Vopr. Ekon. – Quest. of Econ., 2005, No. 7, pp. 1–15 [in Russian].
16. Stiglitz J. Globalizatsiya: Trevozhnye Tendentsii [Globalization and Its Discontents]. Moscow, Moscow Social Sci. Fund, Mysl’, 2003 [in Russian].
17. Glaeser E., Scheinkman J., Shleifer A. The Injustice of Inequality. J. of Monetary Econ., 2003, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 199–222.
18. Kapelyushnikov R. Sobstvennost’ bez legitimnosti? [Property without legitimacy?]. Preprint WP3/2008/03. Moscow, High Economic School, 2008 [in Russian].
19. Reznik V. Stan sotsial’noi legitymnosti pryvatnoi vlasnosti na zemlyu ta kapital, v: Ukrains’ke suspil’stvo 1992–2006. Sotsiologichnyi Monitoryng, za red. V. Vorony, M. Shul’gy [The state of social legitimacy of the private property on land and capital, in: Ukrainian Society in 1992–2006. Sociological Monitoring], edited by V. Vorona, M. Shul’ga. Kyiv, Inst. of Sociol. of the NASU, 2006, pp. 118–128 [in Ukrainian].
20. Auzan A. Vertikal’nyi kontrakt neustoichiv [The vertical contract is unstable]. Otech. Zapiski – Domest. Notes, 2004, No. 6, available at: www.strana-oz.ru/2004/6/vertikalnyy-kontrakt-neustoychiv [in Russian].
21. Barsukova S. Tenevaya ekonomika i tenevaya politika: mekhanizm srashchivaniya [Shadow economy and shadow politicy: mechanism of union]. Preprint WP4/2006/01. Moscow, High Economic School, 2006 [in Russian].
22. Stiglitz J.E. Capital market liberalization, economic growth, and instability. World Development, 2000, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 1075–1086.
23. Bodnarchuk S. Sproshchennya derzhreestratsii: borot’ba z reiderstvom chy dopomoga v nezakonnykh zakhoplennyakh biznesu? [Simplification of the state registration: struggle against the raidership or the help in illegal captures of business?]. Zakon i Biznes – Law and Business, 2016, No. 32 (1278), available at: zib.com.ua/ua/125033-sproschennya_derzhreestracii_borotba_z_reyderstvom_chi_dopom.htm [in Ukrainian].
24. Varnalii Z.S. et al. Tin’ova Ekonomika: Sutnist’, Osoblyvosti ta Shlyakhy Legalizatsii, za red. Z.S. Varnaliya [Shadow Economy: Essence, Peculiarities, and Ways to Legalization], edited by Z.S. Varnalii. Kyiv, NISS, 2006 [in Ukrainian].
25. Sibirtsev A. Lyudi vne gosudarstva [Persons outside of the state]. Inform-Portal “Strana” – Inform-Portal “Country”, March 23, 2016, available at: strana.ua/articles/istorii/4117-lyudi-vne-gosudarstva.html [in Russian].
26. Perkins J. Ispoved’ Ekonomicheskogo Ubiitsy [Confessions of an Economic Hitman]. Moscow, Pretext, 2005 [in Russian].
27. Werner K., Weiss H. Chernaya Kniga Korporatsii [The Black Book of Corporations]. Ekaterinburg, Ultra. Kul’tura, 2007 [in Russian].
28. Radygin A., Entov R. “Fundamental’naya” teorema privatizatsii: ideologiya, evolyutsiya, praktika [The “fundamental” theorem of privatization: ideology, evolution, practice]. Ekon. Polit. – Econ. Policy, 2013, No. 6, pp. 7–45 [in Russian].
29. Sappington D., Stiglitz J. Privatization, information and incentives. J. of Policy Anal. and Manag., 1987, Vol. 6, Iss. 4, pp. 567–585.
30. Polterovich V. Privatizatsiya i Ratsional’naya Struktura Sobstvennosti [Privatization and a Rational Structure of Property]. Moscow, Inst. of Economy of the RAS, 2012 [in Russian].
31. Popov V. Privatizatsiya v teorii i na praktike [Privatization in theory and practice]. Expert. Portal “Otkr. Ekon.” – Expert Portal “Open Econ.”, February 18, 2011, available at: opec.ru/1345942.html [in Russian].
32. Musacchio А., Lazzarini S. Leviathan in Business: Varieties of State Capitalism and their Implications for Economic Performance. Harvard Business School. Working Paper 12-108, June 4, 2012.
33. Avdasheva S., Dolgopyatova T., Pleines H. Korporativnoe upravlenie v AO s gosudarstvennym uchastiem: rossiiskie problemy v kontekste mirovogo opyta [Corporative management in a company with state’s participation: Russian problems in the context of the world experience]. Preprint WP1/2007/01. Moscow, High Economic School, 2007 [in Russian].
34. Franko I. Shcho take sotsializm? V: Ivan Franko. Zibrannya Tvoriv [What is the socialism? In: Ivan Franko. Collection of Works]. Kyiv, Naukova Dumka, 1986, Vol. 45, pp. 44–55 [in Ukrainian].