№ 9/2016

Ekon Ukr. 2016 (9): 70–81

QUESTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AIC

УДК 332.1:911.373

JEL:

ZAIATS Tetyana¹, KRAIEVSKA Halyna²

¹Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/55864441800
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9767-5527
²M. V. Ptukha Institute of Demography and Social Studies of the NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-8855

ECONOMIC FOUNDATION FOR UKRAINE’S RURAL SETTLEMENTS AND PERSPECTIVES OF ITS STRENGTHENING

The formed system of rural settling is an essential basis for ensuring the economic and social development of the country. The transformational changes in such system affect essentially the conditions of vital activity of the population, forms of its employment, and the accessibility of services. The modern dominant structural-functional changes in the system of rural settling in Ukraine (in particular, a refinement of the rural network and a depopulation of the majority of settlements) and the one-profile character of their economic activity deepen the destructive processes of socio-economic degradation of rural territories with extremely undesired consequences for the population (such as the unemployment, low earned incomes, absence of an appropriate access to social services).
Unfortunately, the executed studies confirm that the transformational changes in the sectoral structure of the national economy and in the forms of property and economic activity did not favor a strengthening of the economic basis of the functioning of Ukraine’s rural settlements. The perspectives of their further socio-economic development depend to a significant extent on the efficiency of the system of state’s support of the agrarian sector of the economy and the agriculture as its leading link, as well as on the possibilities of a transformation of personal rural farms into productive forms of a farming. In connection of a complication of the socio-economic situation in Ukraine, it is necessary to focus attention on the development of efficient system measures directed to the preservation of the available rural network of settlements and to the formation of conditions necessary for its development.

Keywords:rural settling, settlement network, economic entities, agrarian sector, perspectives of development

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 70 - 81)	Download	Downloads :323
Article original in Russian (pp. 70 - 81)	Download	Downloads :224

The article was received by the Editorial staff on October 5 , 2015

References
1. Gogol’ T.V. Bagatofunktsional’nyi rozvytok sil’s’kykh terytorii – strategichna meta derzhavnoi regional’noi polityky [The multifunctional development of rural territories is a strategic purpose of state’s regional policy], available at: www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/...1/.../Gogol.pdf [in Ukrainian].
2. Lupenko Yu.O., Malik M.I., Bulavka O.G. et al. Strategichni Napryamy Stalogo Rozvytku Sil’s’kykh Terytorii na Period do 2020 Roku [Strategic Directions of a Sustainable Development of Rural Territories Till 2020]. Kyiv, IAE, 2013 [in Ukrainian].
3. Lupenko Yu.O., Kropyvko M.K. Agrokholdyngy v Ukraini ta posylennya sotsial’noi spryamovanosti ikh diyal’nosti [Agroholdings in Ukraine and the enhancement of the social orientation of their activity]. Ekonomika APK – Econ. of AIC, 2013, No. 7, pp. 5–21 [in Ukrainian].
4. Zayats’ T.A., Kraevs’ka G.O. Derzhavni priorytety rozvytku sil’s’kogo rozselennya Ukrainy [State’s priorities of the development of Ukraine’s rural settling]. Ekon. ta Derzh. – Econ. and State, 2014, No. 10, pp. 15–17 [in Ukrainian].
5. Yurchyshyn V.V. Do problem systemnoi pereorientatsii rozvytku agrosfery na zasadakh socioekonomiky [To problems of the system reorientation of the agrisphere on principles of socioeconomy]. Ekonomika APK – Econ. of AIC, 2013, No. 11, pp. 6–17 [in Ukrainian].
6. Prokopa I., Borodina O. Yaka model’ agrosektoru neobkhidna Ukraini? [Which model of the agrisector is necessary to Ukraine?]. Dzerk. Tyzhnya – Week’s Mirr., 2012, No. 18, available at: dt.ua/ECONOMICS/yaka_model_agrosektoru__neobhidna_ukrayini-102318.html [in Ukrainian].
7. Borodina O.M., Heyets V.M., Gutorov A.O. et al. Ukrains’ka Model’ Agrarnogo Rozvytku ta Ii Sotsioekonomichna Pereorientatsiya, za red. V.M. Geitsya, O.M. Borodinoi, I.V. Prokopy [The Ukrainian Model of Agrarian Development and Its Socio-Economic Reorientation], edited by O.M. Borodina, V.M. Heyets, I.V. Prokopa. Kyiv, Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine, 2012 [in Ukrainian].
8. Moldavan L.V. Formy gospodaryuvannya v agrarnomu sektori krainy v umovakh globalizatsii [Forms of management in country’s agrarian sector under condition of the globalization]. Ekonomika APK – Econ. of AIC, 2010, No. 1, pp. 13–17 [in Ukrainian].
9. Klyuchnyk A.V. Formuvannya i Rozvytok Ekonomichnogo Potentsialu Sil’s’kykh Terytorii Ukrainy [Formation and Development of the Economic Potential of Rural Territories of Ukraine]. Mykolaiv, Dyzain ta Poligr., 2011 [in Ukrainian].
10. Tereshchenko V.K. et al. Sotsial’no-Ekonomichnyi Rozvytok Sil’s’kykh Terytorii: Metodologichno-Prykladni Aspekty, za red. V.K. Tereshchenka [Socio-Economic Development of Rural Territories: Methodological Applied Aspects], edited by V.K. Tereshchenko. Kyiv, Nizhyn, Publ. House M.M. Lysenko, 2012 [in Ukrainian].
11. Sotsial’ni Rezul’taty Derzhavnykh Program: Teoretyko-Metodologichni ta Prykladni Aspekty Otsinyuvannya, za red. E.M. Libanovoi [Social Results of State’s Programs: Methodological-Theoretic and Applied Aspects of Evaluation], edited by E.M. Libanova. Uman’, Publ. House “Sochins’kyi”, 2012 [in Ukrainian].
12. Bil’ovs’kyi O. A. Budivnytstvo dostupnogo orendnogo zhytla yak strategichnyi napryam derzhavnoi zhytlovoi polityky Ukrainy [The building of accessible rental dwellings as a strategic direction of the state housing policy of Ukraine]. Strateg. Prioryt. – Strateg. Priorit., 2014, No. 2 (31), pp. 67–72.