QUESTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AIC УДК 33.330 JEL: Q130 1Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine FEATURES OF CORPORATIZATION OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC PRACTICE: LESSONS FOR UKRAINE The theoretical foundations of the socio-economic nature of the agricultural enterprise, formulated by the founders of agroeconomics A. Thaer, J. Th?nen, T. Brinkman and other scientists, are covered, which allows to substantiate the peculiarities of the agricultural sector corporatization. The history of the penetration of non-agricultural capital into the agricultural sector of different countries during the twentieth century is studied, the preconditions that encouraged or contributed to the corporatization of agriculture through the takeover of farms, unfair competition in the land market, capital colonization of agricultural lands of countries with weak legal instruments and corrupt or incompetent authorities are considered. The specifics and negative consequences of the activity of agro-industrial and trade corporations are generalized, on the example of Ukraine it is proved that they practically do not change depending on the analyzed country or period. The panorama of agroholding of Ukraine is outlined, its three stages are highlighted, their features and consequences for agriculture and rural development are characterized: profitable, investor-oriented; cooperative, oriented on its client member; non-profit, represented by productive socially oriented corporations created for joint economic activity. Only the first type corporations operate in Ukraine, among which domestic and international corporations with non-agricultural capital are increasingly dominating. The basics of agrarian policies of Western European, North American and other countries that have suspended or prevented the colonization of agriculture with industrial, trade and financial capital are systematized. Their directions which are necessary and possible to adapt to conditions of Ukraine for the purpose of creation of the favorable institutional and legal environment for development of corporations of the second and third types are singled out. Keywords:preconditions for corporate development; penetration of non-agricultural capital into the agricultural sector; types of corporations; production socially oriented corporations; cooperatives; institutional environment; state support
1. Shanin T. Forms of agriculture outside the system. Voprosy filosofii, No. 8, 1990, pp. 111-113 [in Russian]. 2. Bulgakov S. Capitalism and Agriculture. Vol. 1, Saint Petersburg, V.A. Tikhanov Printing House and Lithography, 1990 [in Russian]. 3. Gross P. Okonomie im Ekologischen Landbau-Zusammenhage, Daten, Facten. Ekologischer Landau-Landwirtschaft mit Zukunft, Stuttgart, 1985, p. 54 [in German]. 4. Danz W. Sozialfunktionen der Landwirtschaft. Jnnere Kolonisationen-Land and Gemeinde, 21, 1972, pp. 330-333 [in German]. 5. Steinhauser H., Landbehn C., Peters U. Einfuhrrung in die Landwirtschaftliche Betriebslehre. Stuttgart, 1992, pp. 15, 24-25 [in German]. 6. Thaer A. The Principles of Rational Agriculture. Moscow, Published by A. Shiryaev, 1830 [in Russian]. 7. Borodina O., Prokopa I. Support for family farming: slogans and actions. Mirror Weekly, January 16, 2016, Ukraine, p. 8. [in Ukrainian]. 8. Prokopa I. Supporting family farming as a means of promoting rural development: Ukrainian realities and EU practice, in: Proceedings of the XVI Congress of Agricultural Economists and the International Scientific Conference "Modern Problems and Prospects for Sustainable Rural Development". Kyiv, National Research Center "Institute of Agrarian Economics", 2017, pp. 236-241[in Ukrainian]. 9. Onyshchenko O. Socio-economic nature and size of agricultural enterprises. Economy of Ukraine, No. 6, 2000, pp. 56-66 [in Ukrainian]. 10. Yurchishin V. Modern Agrarian Transformations in Ukraine. Retrospective Essay in Three Parts. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for Economics and Forecasting, Kyiv, 2013 [in Ukrainian]. 11. Gaidutskyi P. Agrarian Reform of L.D. Kuchma. Kyiv, LLC "Information Systems", 2015 [in Ukrainian]. 12. Andriichuk V. New types of agroindustrial formations within the framework of the national agrarian development strategy. Ekonomika APK, No. 1, 2013, pp. 3-15 [in Ukrainian]. 13. Lupenko Yu., Kropyvko M. Agroholdings in Ukraine and augmentation of social impact of their activity. Ekonomika APK, No. 7, 2013, pp. 5-20 [in Ukrainian]. 14. Demyanenko S., Yerakin O., Kotsupatriy M. Agroholdings in Ukraine and Their Impact on the Development of Rural Territories. S.I. Demyanenko (Ed.). Kyiv, KNEU, 2013 [in Ukrainian]. 15. Gutorov A. Development of Integration Relations in the Agricultural Sector of the Economy. Kyiv, LLC "SIC-GRUP UKRAINA", 2016 [in Ukrainian]. 16. Malik M., Luzan Yu. Problematic issues of development of cooperatives and integration relations in the agro-industrial complex. Ekonomika APK, No. 3, 2010, pp. 3-9 [in Ukrainian]. 17. Zinovchuk V. Is the European model of agricultural cooperation suitable for Ukraine?, in: Cooperative Readings: 2014. Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, 2014, pp. 9-18 [in Ukrainian]. 18. Drache Hiram M. The Day of the Bananza. Fargo, North Dakota Institute for Regional Students, 1964, p. 93. 19. Reimund D. Farming and agribusiness activities of large multiunit firms. USAID, Washington, 1975. 20. Robbins W. The American Food Scandal: Why You Can't Eat Well on What You Earn. New York, 1974. 21. US agro-industrial associations (organization, management features, role in food production). V.A. Morozov (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1977 [in Russian]. 22. Hachfeld G., Bau D., Holcomb R. Utilizing Partnership & Corporations to Transfer Farm Assets, available at: cffm.umn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/TransferringTheFarmSeries.pdf . 23. Janvrу A. de The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin Ameriсa. Baltimore, Maryland, Jоhns Hopkins University Press, 1981. |
|
Published since September 1958 |
|||
| Login |
| |||