№ 9/2015

Ekon Ukr. 2015 (9): 49–65

ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT: THEORY AND PRACTICE

УДК 330.341.1(477)

JEL:

AMOSHA Oleksandr¹, ZEMLYANKIN Anatolii², PIDORYCHEVA Iryna³

¹Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-3819
²Institute of Industry Economy of the NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/
³Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/ https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57217304933
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4622-8997

IMPROVEMENT OF THE SYSTEM OF MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS AS A CONDITION OF ACCELERATION OF STRUCTURAL REFORMS IN UKRAINE

At present, any state, which demonstrates the inclination to the support of an industrial competitiveness and to the economic growth and the enhancement of the welfare of citizens, refers the backing of the prosperity of science, as well as scientific studies and designs of the productive character, to the list of its leading purposes. In the countries that underwent essential economic shocks, the stimulation of a hidden innovative potential is considered as a significant catalyst of the renewal of their economies.
Till now, the clear relation to the innovative activity has not been formed in Ukraine. The system of state’s management of innovations, which was formed as a result of numerous reforms, has not proved yet its efficiency. Its basic shortcomings are a low level of coordination of intersectoral interactions, a high level of bureaucratization, the real absence of the function of monitoring of the realization of state’s initiatives, the insufficient transparency of the activity of public administration bodies of all levels, and the absence of the responsibility of representatives of the power for own actions and decisions.
The acting mechanisms of management of innovations create no efficient stimuli for the collaboration of producers and consumers of knowledge, as well as the public and private sectors of the economy, and do not favor a growth of investments to the innovative activity and high-tech productions. The demand of industrial enterprises for innovations is restricted, and the interconnections between the key subjects of the innovative process – science and production – have mainly the formal character. Like earlier, there are no connecting “bridges” between them, which does not allow them to efficiently interact, to exchange by resources and knowledge, and to create the feedback chains.
The solution of current problems requires the implementation of a targeted public economic policy and the sharp increase of requirements to the system of management of innovations in order to accelerate the structural reforms in Ukraine’s modern economy. The specific steps in this direction should foresee the support and the development of the intersectoral collaboration, enhancement of the transparency, openness, and responsibility of authorities, and the development of their communicative interaction with science, business, and community.

Keywords:crisis, structural reforms, innovative renewal, investment climate, innovative strategy, system of management of innovations, mechanisms of management of innovations, innovative system, intersectoral collaboration, communications, openness, transparency, responsibility

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 49 - 65)	Download	Downloads :209
Article original in Russian (pp. 49 - 65)	Download	Downloads :204

The article was received by the Editorial staff on May 7 , 2015

References
1. Zemlyankin A.I., Pidorycheva I.Yu. Analogii i vidminnosti systemnykh kryz u kolyshnii Yugoslavii ta nynishnii Ukraini [Analogs and differences of the system crises in the former Yugoslavia and the contemporary Ukraine]. Viche – Assembly, 2014, No. 23, pp. 2–8 [in Ukrainian].
2. Goldberg I., Goddard J.G., Kuriakose S., Racine J.-L. Igniting innovation: rethinking the role of government in emerging Europe and Central Asia. Washington, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2011, available at: www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2011/09/30/000356161_20110930033352/Rendered/PDF/647000PUB0EPI000Box361544B00PUBLIC0.pdf.
3. David P.A. Clio and economics of QWERTY. Amer. Econ. Rev., 1985, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 332–337.
4. North D. Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World Development, 1989, Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 1319–1332.
5. North D., Wallis D., Weingast B. Nasilie i Sotsial’nye Poryadki. Kontseptual’nye Ramki dlya Interpretatsii Pis’mennoi Istorii Chelovechestva [Violation and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History]. – Moscow, Gaidar Institute, 2011 [in Russian].
6. Cooke P. Strategies for regional innovation systems: learning transfer and applications, available at: www.paca-online.org/cop/docs/P_Cooke_Strategies_for_regional_innovation_systems.pdf.
7. Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S. The global innovation index 2014: Human factor in innovation, available at: www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/gii-2014-cover-v3.pdf.
8. Pidorycheva I.Yu. Finansove zabezpechennya ta organizatsiino-ekonomichne suprovodzhennya innovatsiinykh protsesiv v ekonomitsi Ukrainy [Financial provision and organizational-economic escort of innovative processes in Ukraine’s economy]. Ekon. Visn. Donbasu. – Econ. Bull. Donbas, 2014, No. 3 (37), pp. 154–170 [in Ukrainian].
9. Rodrik D. Industrial policy for the twenty-first century, available at: file:///C:/Users/1/Downloads/RWP04-047.pdf.