Economy of Ukraine
Published since September 1958
Login

№ 1/2021

Ekon Ukr. 2021 (1): 24–39
https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2021.01.024

PROBLEMS OF ECONOMIC THEORY

УДК 311.2:330.3

JEL: O35

ZVONAR Viktor1

1Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/ https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1300-4791


SOURCES AND PRINCIPLES OF SOCIAL CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT


The paper elucidates the specifics of sources and principles of social capital development as an essential component of economy socialization processes. The potential of education, civil activism (volunteering in particular) and social innovations as sources of social capital development is reasoned. In this respect, the gamification is considered to be a striking example of an innovation with the constructive impact and the ability to initiate and support the processes of social cohesion. The prospects and advantages of gamification are regarded as tangible in view of the fact that its elements are being widely employed by commercial companies in personnel consolidation. In Ukraine, gamification proved effective also in public management for enhancing communication and cooperation in local communities. Both the central government and the local authorities have found the gamification approach valuable in this regard.
The paper argues that the current scientific discourse virtually neglects the significance of educational aspects of social capital formation. It is concluded, that under present conditions education must be deemed as a crucial source of social capital. With reference to this, the paramount importance of general (school) education having probably the strongest social impact is postulated.
It is claimed that basically, the principles of social capital development imply its nature as an economic phenomenon and resource. Such principles include sociocentric rationality, complex (Pareto efficient) utilitarianism, synergy of socio-economic interaction being institutionally preconditioned, as well as social freedom. In this regard, the understanding of the differences between social and individual freedom is deepened. It is proposed to consider social freedom as a principle of social capital development from the standpoint of complexity, which involves taking into account the specifics of civil and economic freedom, as well as the imperatives of human development.


Keywords:social capital; sources and principles of development; education; activism; volunteering; social innovations.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 24 - 39) DownloadDownloads :107
The article was received by the Editorial staff on October 19 , 2020

References

1. Burkyns'kyi B., Goryachuk V. Social capital: essence, sources, structure, and its estimate. Economy of Ukraine, No. 1, 2013, pp. 67-81 [in Ukrainian].

2. Zvonar V. Social Responsibility as a Socioeconomic Phenomenon: Theory and Ukrainian Realities. Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, 2018, pp. 211-224 [in Ukrainian].

3. Decker L.E., Boo M.R. Community Schools: Linking Home, School, and Community. National Community Education Publication Series, 1996.

4. Karpenko M. Vigorosity as a condition for innovations and as a factor of development human resources. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, No. 4, 2012, pp. 103-107 [in Russian].

5. Preparation of Volunteers for Social Work. A.Yo. Kapska (Ed.). Kyiv, State Social Service, 2005 [in Ukrainian].

6. Kudrinskaya L. Volunteer work: the experience of theoretical reconstruction. Moscow State University, Moscow, 2006 [in Russian].

7. Stebbins R. After Work: The Search for an Optimal Leisure Lifestyle. Sociological Research, No. 7, 2000, 64-72 [in Russian].

8. Plahova O. Corporate Volunteering as an Expression of Corporate Social Responsibility. Methodology, Theory and Practice of Sociological Analysis of Modern Society, Iss. 20, 2014, pp. 263-266 [in Ukrainian].

9. Shanin T. Social work: ideology of professionalism. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2004, pp. 303-328 [in Russian].

10. McCurley S., Lynch R. Volunteer Management. Kyiv, Resource Center for Development of Public Organizations "Group," 1998 [in Ukrainian].

11. Yurchenko I. Motivational aspects of volunteer activity, in: Social Dimensions of Society. Kyiv, Institute of Sociology of NAS of Ukraine, Iss. 1 (12), 2009, pp. 361-368, available at: dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/28844/31-Yurchenko.pdf?sequence=1 [in Ukrainian].

12. Shekova E. Voluntary labor relations: basic definitions. Man and Labor, No. 4, 2003, pp. 6-7 [in Russian].

13. Nabatova O. Social innovation: definition, types, subjects. The Bulletin of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, No. 6, 2011, pp. 58-66 [in Ukrainian].

14. Kremenchutska M. Game as personality's creative activity. Science and Education, No. 1, 2015, pp. 104-108 [in Ukrainian].

15. Werbach K. Gamification. Online course on Coursera Platform. University of Pennsylvania, available at: www.coursera.org/learn/gamification/

16. Simon H. Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. THESIS, Iss. 3, 1993, pp. 16-38 [in Russian].

17. Law and Economics: An Institutional Perspective. W.J. Samuels, A.A. Schmid (Eds.). Boston, Hague, London, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, pp. 56-57.

18. Veblen T. The Theory of Leisure Class. Economy of Institutions. New York, 1899.

19. Slobodyanyuk L. Human freedom: individual and social dimensions. Lviv, 2007 [in Ukrainian].