Economy of Ukraine
Published since September 1958
Login

№ 7/2021

Ekon Ukr. 2021 (7): 54–74
https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2021.07.054

УДК 352/354.072.2—047.74:303.424Х909

JEL: E69, H11

MANTSUROV Igor1, KHRAPUNOVA Yana2, OMELCHENKO Valeriy3

1Institute for System Statistical Studies, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/H-1247-2017
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-0422
2Institute for System Statistical Studies, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/AAY-6006-2020
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6311-3235
3Research Institute of Economics at the Ministry of Economic of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-0693


INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, PLANNING AND CONTROL IN THE SYSTEM OF THE GOVERNMENTAL MANAGEMENT


The aim of this article is to develop a conceptual model of the institutional analysis, planning and control comprehensive system, which, according to the authors’ point of view, has to be integrated organically into the overall system of the governmental management.
The article starts with the analysis of the of the “new institutional economics” methodology’s contributions to theoretical research in the area of applied economics, with particular emphasis to developing countries, particularly to Ukraine.
Then authors continue by providing an overview of the new institutional economics theory and methodology as well as their several branches. Particularly, it is described the authors’ point of view in regard to the fundamental definitions of the institutional theory.
One of the article’s purposes is to outline the basic features of the institutional planning theory and to justify its interpretation in the general planning theory framework. Carrying out this task, the authors describe the existing diversity of planning theories and the main achievements of the new institutional economics in the development and implementation of planning procedures.
From authors’ point of view, institutional planning is the economic theory in which planning is described as the sequence of actions of organizations or/and people responsible for planning procedures and stakeholders in order to get the immediate and final planning results.
The successful implementation of such model would help the planners and stakeholders to get the results that consist in the effectiveness of the national economy and its competitiveness.


Keywords:new institutional economics; institutions and organizations, planning theory, institutional environment, institutional analysis, control and planning, state regulation of the national economy.

Article original in English (pp. 54 - 74) DownloadDownloads :109
Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 54 - 74) DownloadDownloads :128
The article was received by the Editorial staff on July 1 , 2021

References

1. Coase R. The Nature of the Firm. Economica New Series, 1937, No. 4(16), pp. 394-395.
doi.org/10.2307/2626891

2. Coase R. The New Institutional Economics. The American Economic Review, 1998, No. 88 (2), pp. 211-215.

3. Williamson O.E. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, No. 38 (3), pp. 595-613.
doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595

4. Allmendinger P. Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Planning Theory, 2002, No. 1(1), pp. 77-99.
doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100105

5. Alexander E.R. Institutionalist Perspectives on Planning: Why? Where? How? In: Institutions and Planning: An Analogical Inquiry. Verma N. (Ed.). Oxford : Elsevier. 2007, pр. 37-59.

6. North D.C. The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. In: The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. J. Harriss, J. Hunter, C.M. Lewis (Eds). 1995, pp. 17-26.
doi.org/10.4324/9780203444290.pt1

7. Sanyal B. (Ed.) Comparative Planning Cultures. New York. Routledge, 2005.

8. Sorensen A. New Institutionalism and Planning Theory. In: Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, V. Watson (Eds.). New York, Routledge, 2017, pp. 250-263.
doi.org/10.4324/9781315696072-20

9. Gibbons R. Transaction-cost Economics: Past, Present, and Future? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2010, No. 112 (2).
doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2010.01609.x

10. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

11. North D.C. Transaction Costs, Institutions, and Economic Performance. International Center for Economic Growth (n.d.), 1992.

12. Keynes J.M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. King's College, Cambridge, Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, 1936.

13. Macher J.T., Richman B.D. Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences. Business and Politics, 2008, No. 10 (1).
doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1210

14. Healey P. Collaborative Planning in Perspective. Planning Theory, 2003, No. 2 (2), pp. 101-123.
doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022002

15. Lai S.-K., Han H. Behavioral Planning Theory. In: Encyclopedia of Business Analytics and Optimization. J. Wang (Ed.). Hershey. IGI Global, 2014, pp. 265-272.
doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5202-6.ch025

16. Ostrom E. Doing Institutional Analysis: Digging Deeper than Markets and Hierarchies. In: Handbook of New Institutional Economics. C. Ménard, M. Shirley (Eds.). Springer. Handbook of New Institutional Economics, 2005, pp. 819-848.
doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25092-1_31

17. Othengrafen F. The Concept of Planning Culture: Analysing How Planners Construct Practical Judgements in a Culturised Context. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 2014, No. 3 (2), pp. 1-17.
doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2014040101

18. Connell D.J., Daoust-Filiatrault L.-A. Better Than Good: Three Dimensions of Plan Quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2017.
doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17709501

19. Goodspeed R. The Death and Life of Collaborative Planning Theory. Urban Planning, 2016, No. 1 (4), pp. 1-5.
doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.715

20. Guyadeen D. Do Practicing Planners Value Plan Quality? Insights from a Survey of Planning Professionals in Ontario, Canada. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2018, No. 84 (1), pp. 21-32.
doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2017.1404486

21. Lord A. Towards a non-theoretical understanding of planning. Planning Theory, 2014, No. 13 (1), pp. 26-43.
doi.org/10.1177/1473095213477642

22. Lord A., Mair M., Sturzaker J., Jones P. The planners' dream goes wrong?, 2017.

23. Tasan-Kok T., Baeten G. (Eds.) Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning: Cities, Policies, and Politics. Dordrecht. Springer, 2012.
doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8924-3

24. Mantsurov I.G. Institutional Planning in the System of the National Economy State Regulation. Kyiv, SRIE, 2014, 457 p. [in Ukrainian].