УДК 352/354.072.2—047.74:303.424Х909 JEL: E69, H11 MANTSUROV Igor1, KHRAPUNOVA Yana2, OMELCHENKO Valeriy3 1Institute for System Statistical Studies, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/H-1247-2017 INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, PLANNING AND CONTROL IN THE SYSTEM OF THE GOVERNMENTAL MANAGEMENT The aim of this article is to develop a conceptual model of the institutional analysis, planning and control comprehensive system, which, according to the authors’ point of view, has to be integrated organically into the overall system of the governmental management. Keywords:new institutional economics; institutions and organizations, planning theory, institutional environment, institutional analysis, control and planning, state regulation of the national economy.
1. Coase R. The Nature of the Firm. Economica New Series, 1937, No. 4(16), pp. 394-395. doi.org/10.2307/2626891 2. Coase R. The New Institutional Economics. The American Economic Review, 1998, No. 88 (2), pp. 211-215. 3. Williamson O.E. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, No. 38 (3), pp. 595-613. doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595 4. Allmendinger P. Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Planning Theory, 2002, No. 1(1), pp. 77-99. doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100105 5. Alexander E.R. Institutionalist Perspectives on Planning: Why? Where? How? In: Institutions and Planning: An Analogical Inquiry. Verma N. (Ed.). Oxford : Elsevier. 2007, pр. 37-59. 6. North D.C. The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. In: The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. J. Harriss, J. Hunter, C.M. Lewis (Eds). 1995, pp. 17-26. doi.org/10.4324/9780203444290.pt1 7. Sanyal B. (Ed.) Comparative Planning Cultures. New York. Routledge, 2005. 8. Sorensen A. New Institutionalism and Planning Theory. In: Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, V. Watson (Eds.). New York, Routledge, 2017, pp. 250-263. doi.org/10.4324/9781315696072-20 9. Gibbons R. Transaction-cost Economics: Past, Present, and Future? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2010, No. 112 (2). doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2010.01609.x 10. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990. doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678 11. North D.C. Transaction Costs, Institutions, and Economic Performance. International Center for Economic Growth (n.d.), 1992. 12. Keynes J.M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. King's College, Cambridge, Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, 1936. 13. Macher J.T., Richman B.D. Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences. Business and Politics, 2008, No. 10 (1). doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1210 14. Healey P. Collaborative Planning in Perspective. Planning Theory, 2003, No. 2 (2), pp. 101-123. doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022002 15. Lai S.-K., Han H. Behavioral Planning Theory. In: Encyclopedia of Business Analytics and Optimization. J. Wang (Ed.). Hershey. IGI Global, 2014, pp. 265-272. doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5202-6.ch025 16. Ostrom E. Doing Institutional Analysis: Digging Deeper than Markets and Hierarchies. In: Handbook of New Institutional Economics. C. Ménard, M. Shirley (Eds.). Springer. Handbook of New Institutional Economics, 2005, pp. 819-848. doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25092-1_31 17. Othengrafen F. The Concept of Planning Culture: Analysing How Planners Construct Practical Judgements in a Culturised Context. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 2014, No. 3 (2), pp. 1-17. doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2014040101 18. Connell D.J., Daoust-Filiatrault L.-A. Better Than Good: Three Dimensions of Plan Quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2017. doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17709501 19. Goodspeed R. The Death and Life of Collaborative Planning Theory. Urban Planning, 2016, No. 1 (4), pp. 1-5. doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.715 20. Guyadeen D. Do Practicing Planners Value Plan Quality? Insights from a Survey of Planning Professionals in Ontario, Canada. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2018, No. 84 (1), pp. 21-32. doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2017.1404486 21. Lord A. Towards a non-theoretical understanding of planning. Planning Theory, 2014, No. 13 (1), pp. 26-43. doi.org/10.1177/1473095213477642 22. Lord A., Mair M., Sturzaker J., Jones P. The planners' dream goes wrong?, 2017. 23. Tasan-Kok T., Baeten G. (Eds.) Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning: Cities, Policies, and Politics. Dordrecht. Springer, 2012. doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8924-3 24. Mantsurov I.G. Institutional Planning in the System of the National Economy State Regulation. Kyiv, SRIE, 2014, 457 p. [in Ukrainian]. |