Economy of Ukraine
Published since September 1958
Login

№ 4/2023

Ekon Ukr. 2023 (4): 38–54
https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.04.038

GEOECONOMIC TRANSFORMATIONS IN THE GLOBAL WORLD SYSTEM

УДК 330.344; 339.98

JEL: O10, E61, F52

GRYTSENKO Andrii1

1Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5030-864X


NATIONALLY ROOTED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AS A LOCAL RESPONSE TO THE GLOBAL GEOECONOMIC SHIFTS


The logical and historical conditionality and essence of the national rooting of economic development as a local response to global economic shifts are elucidated. It is revealed that the ongoing transition from the industrial-market to the information-network economy naturally leads to an increase in the unevenness of socio-economic development, exacerbates its contradictions, and gives rise to conflicts and wars. On this basis, a hybrid "peace-war" system forms, which naturally produces destabilizing influences and increases the uncertainty of economic dynamics.
It is shown that the structure of total uncertainty includes existential, spatial, temporal, qualitative, quantitative and dimensional components. In such conditions, there is a need, in order to ensure the stability and security of economic development, to foster its national rooting by forming an extensive system of added value creation chains based on the use of domestic scientific and technical potential and processing of national raw materials resources, which Ukraine is sufficiently rich in.
A share of added value of national origin, created using the national resources, in the total value of consumed final products is proposed as a quantitative criterion of the national rootedness of economic development. It is concluded that the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine's economy, which will take place under fundamentally new starting conditions, opens space for the use of nationally rooted development strategy. Such a strategy is neither isolationism nor protectionism, but a combination of internal inclusiveness, which relies on the mobilization of all internal factors, physical and social capital as sources of economic growth, and external inclusiveness, aimed at using globalization to advance the interests of national socio-economic development.


Keywords:nationally rooted economic development; economic systems; hybrid "peace-war" system; globalization; localization; stability; security; inclusiveness of economic development.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 38 - 54) DownloadDownloads :200
The article was received by the Editorial staff on March 22 , 2023

References

1. Economic contradictions of globalization and localization in the conditions of hybrid war and post-war reconstruction. A.A. Hrytsenko (Ed.). Kyiv, 2022. URL: ief.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Ec-superech-globaliz-ta-localiz-v-umomah-gibryd-viyny.pdf [in Ukrainian].

2. Altman S.A., Bastian C.R. The State of Globalization in 2022. Harvard Business Review, 2022, Apr 12. URL: hbr.org/2022/04/the-state-of-globalization-in-2022 (accessed on: 20.02.2023).

3. Kalb D., Land M. van der, Staring R. et al. The Ends of Globalization: Bringing Society Back in. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000. URL: books.google.com.tr/books?id=TtF898osFlQC&hl=uk&source=gbs_navlinks_s

4. Hines C. Time to Replace Globalization with Localization. Global Environmental Politics, 2003, Vol. 3, Iss. 3, pp. 1-7.
doi.org/10.1162/152638003322469240

5. Albala-Bertrand J.M. Globalization and Localization: An Economic Approach. In: Handbook of Disaster Research, 2007. URL: citations.springernature.com/item?doi=10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_9
doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_9

6. Gay W.C. Understanding and Assessing Globalization: The Role of Global Studies. In: Parceling the Globe; Philosophical Explorations in Globalization, Global Behavior, and Peace. D. Poe, E. Souffrant (Eds.). Amsterdam, Rodopi, 2008, pp. 17-25.
doi.org/10.1163/9789401206211_003

7. Grytsenko A. Strategies of economic stability in unstable environment. Economy and forecasting, 2022, No. 3, pp. 33-43 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.03.033

8. Robertson R. Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity. In: Global Modernities. M. Featherstone, S. Lash, R. Robertson (Eds.). London, 1995, pp. 25-44. URL: sk.sagepub.com/books/global-modernities/n2.xml
doi.org/10.4135/9781446250563.n2

9. Zhukov S., Diugowanets O. Multinational Corporations' International Marketing in the Focus of the Global Regionalization Process. Virtual Economics, 2020, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 188-210. URL: virtual-economics.eu/index.php/VE/article/view/91/71
doi.org/10.34021/ve.2020.03.04(10)

10. Batchenko L.V. Dialectics of glocalization, or localization as a response to the challenges of globalization. In: Prometheus. Regional Collection of Scientific Works in Economics, 2004, Vol. 1 (13), pp. 25-29 [in Ukrainian].

11. Honcharova O.V. Conceptual and categorical essence and basic principles of glocalization. In: Formation of market economy, 2009, Vol. 22, pp. 464-472. URL: base.dnsgb.com.ua/files/journal/Formuvannya-rynkovoi-ekonomiky/FRE-2009-22/2009_22-goncharova.pdf [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-89836-9_168

12. Zhukov S.A. Glocalization as a modern and promising process in development of the world economy and international economic relations. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University, Series "Economics", 2014, Vol. 3 (44), pp. 199-201 [in Ukrainian].

13. Bekh K. Interpretation of the term "glocalization" in researches of the world economy and international economic relations. Journal of International Relations of KNU, 2021, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 55-58. URL: journals.iir.kiev.ua/index.php/knu/article/view/4251/3893 [in Ukrainian].

14. Lukyanenko D.H., Poruchnyk A.M., Kolot A.M. Global economy of the 21st century: the human dimension. Kyiv, 2008 [in Ukrainian].

15. Shavkun I.H. Management of the 21st century: collision between globalization and regionalization. In: Humanities bulletin of Zaporizhzhe state engineering academy, 2008, Vol. 35, pp. 90-99 [in Ukrainian].

16. Pavlenko Yu.V. History of world civilization. Philosophical analysis. Kyiv, 2002 [in Russian].

17. Toynbee A.J. Civilization on Trial. N. Y., Oxford University Press, 1948. URL: ia801606.us.archive.org/22/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.185313/2015.185313.Civilization-On-Trial.pdf

18. Bohushova I.V. Correlation of formational and civilizational approaches to the typology of states: theoretical and legal analysis. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 2011, No. 3, pp. 43-46. URL: kul.kiev.ua/images/chasop/2011_3/43.pdf [in Ukrainian].

19. Butchenko T.I. Formation and Civilization Approaches: the Ways to Complement Each Other. Culturological Bulletin, 2013, Vol. 30, pp. 80-83. URL: nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Kultv_2013_30_16 [in Ukrainian].

20. Hegel G. Science of Logic. Vol. 3. M., 1972 [in Russian].

21. Hegel G. Science of Logic. Vol. 2. M., 1970 [in Russian].

22. Grytsenko A. Information-digital stage of development of socio-economic systems. Economy of Ukraine, 2022, No. 1, pp. 29-46 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.029

23. Heyets V. Social reality in the digital space. Economy of Ukraine, 2022, No. 1, pp. 3-28 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.003

24. Heyets V.M. Socialization and its success in the model of achieving the development of the social world. Economic Theory, 2021, No. 4, pp. 5-40 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/etet2021.04.005

25. Grytsenko A.A. Economic contradictions of globalization and localization and their modern manifestations. Economic Theory, 2022, No. 4, pp. 5-29 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.04.005

26. Panafidina O. The idea of historical finalism in world philosophical thought. Actual Problems of Mind, 2008, No. 9, pp. 103-125 [in Ukrainian].

27. Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. N. Y., Free Press, 1992.

28. Hegel G. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 1: Science of Logic. M., 1974 [in Russian].

29. Popovych K. Hybrid war as a modern method of warfare: historical and contemporary dimensions. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History, 2016, Vol. 2 (35), pp. 75-79. URL: shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Popovych_Kateryna/Hibrydna_viina_iak_suchasnyi_sposib_vedennia_viiny_istorychnyi_ta_suchasnyi_vymiry.pdf [in Ukrainian].

30. Andriyevskyy T. Conceptualization of the hybrid war concept: political dimension. Sučasne suspìlʹstvo, 2017, Vol. 1 (13), pp. 4-15. URL: journals.hnpu.edu.ua/index.php/politology/article/view/212 [in Ukrainian].

31. War "hybrid". In: Encyclopedic dictionary of political science. M.P. Trebin (Ed.). Kharkiv, 2015 [in Ukrainian].

32. Heyets V.M. From turbulence to laminar dynamics on the basis of equal competition. Economic theory, 2022, No. 3, pp. 5-28 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.03.005

33. Galetskyy L.S., Remezova O.O., Cherniyenko N.M. Role and value of strategic mineral resources of Ukraine for Europe. In: Problems and prospects of the geology development: science and production. 3rd International Geological Forum. Kyiv, 2016 [in Ukrainian].

34. General mechanism and factors of stabilization of Ukraine's socio-economic development. V.M. Heyets, A.A. Grytsenko (Eds.). Kyiv, 2022. URL: ief.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Zagalnyj-mehanizm-ta-chynnyky-stabilizacii.pdf [in Ukrainian].

35. Heyets V. Endogenous Social Progress as a Source of Economic Growth. Ekonomista, 2021, Vol. 1, pp. 167-181. URL: www.pte.pl/pliki/1/8905/Ekonomista_21-1_167-181.pdf
doi.org/10.52335/dvqigjykfff6